Showing posts with label christian bale. Show all posts
Showing posts with label christian bale. Show all posts

Wednesday, 24 June 2015

Saga Review: The Terminator

So with Terminator: Genisys arriving to cinemas soon I feel it is important to look back at the series as a whole.

I love the Terminator franchise, or at least I love the first two movies and appreciate the mythos and universe they have created. The series itself is a bit of a contradiction: on the one hand it is one of the most successful and bankable franchises Hollywood has produced, but on the other hand The Terminator narrative is a black hole of various time paradoxes. Paradoxes that only seem to become worse as the series goes on!

A great deal of people boycott any of the films after Terminator 2: Judgment Day, and I mostly agree.

What I will say, and plead to everyone reading this, if you haven't seen The Terminator or Terminator 2 but intend to see Terminator: Genisys, please, please, please watch the two of them first.
While I would love to be wrong about this, Genisys looks like it is going to be a massive failure, or at least poison the new generation with a watered down "alternate version" of two of cinema's greatest achievements. I do not exaggerate.

Not doing anything tonight? Watch those films! 



The Terminator (1984)

Before either of them were the famous Hollywood icons they are now, Arnold Schwarzenegger and James Cameron created a small but unstoppable film that would define 1980s cinema.

In 2029, humanity is on the brink of extinction: the machines and computers once built to protect and serve them having gained intelligence and caused massive nuclear destruction. But as one savior rises up, John Connor, the machines send an assassin back in time to 1984 to kill his mother.

It cannot be disputed, this is one of the greats. Director James Cameron had only "Piranha Part 2: The Spawning" to his name, and while Schwarzenegger of course had a career in bodybuilding, he had only the two Conan films critically by this point. The Terminator would make these two become fast friends, create a franchise, teach Cameron a great deal about film-making and bring together several people before the creation of the blockbuster hit film Aliens.

What can be said about the film itself, asides from its legacy? It is a short movie at one hundred minutes (its sequel is a mighty two and a half hours) and I was surprised and impressed how silent it is. Here's a film that knows when to keep things simple and never over explain or talk needlessly. The term Tech Noir isn't just restrained to a club in the film itself, but as a descriptor for The Terminator's cinematography; the film is set perpetually at night as our victim Sarah Connor (Linda Hamilton) is pursued by the inhuman malice and aided by future war soldier Kyle Reese (Michael Biehn). The colour palette is often stark steel grey and blues, the music is either a shrieking synth or droning, thudding bass, representing the cold future war scenario leaking into our time.

It is a continuous chase. As Kyle Reese says: "It absolutely will not stop", our heroes are worn out over the experience, even while the Terminator isn't present it has a sort of omnipresence akin to the Alien.
I really wish I could have experienced it when it released (but then this was one of the many amazing 1980s films released in my birth year!) and appreciate the terror that it must have given. This is a horror film, or even a slasher film, long before 1991's Terminator 2 made itself an action thriller. The Terminator is at first believed to be a serial killer by the police department; systematically murdering all of the Sarah Connors in the phone book (yup, the phone book) by simply arriving at their front door and silently gunning them down. That, and the chilling final scene that still grips me. I adore practical effects, and the Terminator puppet work is one of my all time favourites.

Sure, it has dated. "Oh, look, lawl, its soooooo fake looking," says the newest generations, "That's totally a model lawl, this is dumb" even the music at times can feel retro and not in the good way. Especially since the Terminator franchise has now exploded so far as to have spin offs with Alien and Robocop. But considering it only had a budget of $6 million (compare that with Ghostbusters of the same year with $32 million!) it is an incredible achievement!

The Terminator, regardless of what the franchise has warped it into, or what the public foolishly demands it becomes, is the definition of the series. This hard as nails, bleak and brutal science fiction slasher film is genesis.


Additional Marshmallows: I even noticed something new, after a dozen times I have watched this. During the pickup truck / motorcycle chase, the Terminator's sunglasses reflect the two red taillights of the truck ahead, depicting the machine's piercing red eyes.

Additional, additional Marshmallows: Did you know that Harlan Ellison, a speculative fiction author, sued Cameron for copyright infringement, believing the material to have been ripped from his scripts of two episodes from The Outer Limits? He was given an undisclosed sum as compensation.
But in reality, The Terminator was conceptualised after James Cameron had been ill and had dreamt of a metallic torso dragging itself from an explosion carrying kitchen knives! His dreams having been influenced by the 70s and 80s boom of slasher movies.   




Terminator 2: Judgment Day (1991)

The defining sequel of all action movies; bigger and badder, a defining milestone of cinema special effects, and to this day an effective (albeit preposterous) way of making 30-something men tear up.

About a decade after the events of The Terminator young John Connor is targeted by a new, more deadly machine sent by Skynet from the future. However, another protector was sent back once again to defend him, it is a race against time and humanity's fate is on the line.

I must attempt to resist gushing about this movie like my inner ten year old wants me to, but seriously, I have seen this film so many times. I had lots of the toys when I was younger (I still keep my silver Terminator endoskeleton as a prized possession) I definitely watched this under-aged as I used to shy away from the gorier moments but relished all the action and Arnold's awesome portrayal as the iconic cyborg.

The film, released seven years after the original, follows director James Cameron after he had reached dizzying heights with Aliens and The Abyss, both praised for incredible vision and effects both digital and practical. Terminator 2: Judgment Day remains to this day a milestone in these practices. Virtually flawless, it hit a sweet spot in cinema history with the advent of fully digital effects and priceless puppet work (I still adore that opening sequence!) with the right man at the helm: this was Cameron's baby, the successor to the work that made his name.

But Schwarzenegger was clearly a massive star by 1991. Since we last saw him in the role he had completed Commando, Predator, Twins, Total Recall and even Kindergarden Cop! Now a cynic could argue that someone decided portraying Arnie as a villain again would be a terrible misstep, that the audiences were used to him as the hero. Whether that is true or not, the effect of switching the Terminator from antagonist to protagonist was a dynamite move here as it flipped our perceptions of him.
More importantly, it changes Sarah Connor's character, reprised by Linda Hamilton who honestly makes the film her own. This isn't Arnie's film, it isn't even John Connor's film (the savior of humanity!) it's Sarah's film and her battle to protect her son and the one against her own personal demons. It is a powerful performance.

While far more bombastic and hair-raising than its predecessor (with a whopping budget of $102,000,000, a mere $96,000,000 more than The Terminator!) and it has bone rattling chase sequences that go on and on and on (so good) it is still amazingly well shot and still keeps itself paced and grim when it needs to be.
You know how action movies these days always shake the camera? All the time? Terminator 2 never does that, ever. Intense, awesome and spectacular action sequences are all captured with slow, calm and measured camera work! The movie takes time to show you details even during intense moments, why else do fans adore the moment when the Terminator reloads a shotgun by spinning it around his wrist while riding a motorcycle, because we can see it happening!

As for the newcomers Robert Patrick, in his most stand out role, as the mercilessly cool headed T-1000, and young Edward Furlong as John Connor are excellent and debatable respectively. Patrick has the tough task of appearing more threatening than Arnold in full costume with a lithe figure and a police uniform... and it works! While Furlong... plays Connor as a product of the early 90s... which is unfortunate.
The tried and tested "machine learns what it means to be human" storyline is somewhat laboured nowadays, coupled with Connor's now ridiculous 1990s dialogue, gets a little silly, but the heart is in the right place when put together with Linda Hamilton's bold, stoic mother figure.

It is a feat of cinema hardly matched, you simply don't get action movies like this anymore; they are bogged down with romance, overuse of CGI, needlessly attempting to recapture past glory or all three. I basically just described the future of the Terminator franchise.

Now I am sad.

Watch Terminator 2: Judgment Day before any other in the series, I beg of you. This to me is when the franchise ended, it was short but it was sweet, so very sweet.




Additional Marshmallows: If you haven't seen any Terminator films before the release of Terminator: Genisys then please, at least, watch this film. I swear you won't regret it and I am only asking of you 143 minutes of your life.
          



Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines (2003)

I think this is the last time I watch Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines.

After the events of Terminator 2, Judgment Day has been prevented and John Connor finds himself paranoid without purpose. But when the Terminator returns once again from the future to protect him from an even worse threat, the Terminatrix, he discovers fate may be even harder to escape than before.

Straight out of the gate, something is wrong with this film: there's no Terminator theme over the opening title. That's like a Star Wars film without an opening title crawl! 

After this blasphemy things look slightly up, we see an older John Connor played by Nick Stahl who remains consistent throughout the film and is possibly its only decent contributor! John is lost and paranoid over the prophecy he is meant to fulfill, a moody narration and night-time bike ride introduction reminds us of where we left off.

Then the Terminatrix appears... and we realise the true tone of this movie. Kristanna Loken plays the new "advanced" killing machine. A killing machine so cold and merciless that when pulled over by a cop for speeding she is inspired by a Victoria's Secret advert to inflate her breasts to get the drop on the cop.
Then the Terminator arrives, Arnold Schwarzenegger weathering the twenty-two years surprisingly well, only to be entering a bar hosting a Ladies' Night. The only man with clothes the right size? The stripper, who has rose-tinted star-shaped sunglasses in his pocket and tells the Terminator to "Talk to the Hand".

(audible sigh of disgust)

Terminator 3 is a product of lazy writing and the need to make a quick buck; it is a parody of Terminator 2, and that is putting things nicely. Director Jonathan Mostow has only two other major films to date (U-571 and Surrogates) and apart from Nick Stahl (who I think was working solely off material from Terminator 2) he apparently cannot direct actors to save himself. 
Kristanna Loken's Terminatrix is awful, just awful. Inclining her head "robotically" every chance she gets, pouting, experiencing orgasm when she discovers John Connor's blood, her robot inflections are garbage to the point people would suspect she was a machine! Robert Patrick's T-1000 has more infiltration skills than her!
Heck even Arnold, the one who made the franchise what it is and the reason this film exists, looks like he's phoning it in; stomping around like Darth Vader at the end of Revenge of the Sith.

Mostow clearly didn't know what he was doing with the series, so he compensates with action sequences. After all, Terminator 2 defined the modern action genre. But so much of this film is played for laughs, even the action scenes, I cannot appreciate it at all! Terminators constantly make metal "bong" sounds when they hit into things, Arnie gets pasted into the windshield of an oncoming truck like a massive Austrian mosquito, the Terminatrix grabs his crotch at one point, the Terminatrix gets her head smashed down into a toilet, there's even a random garden toy that gets knocked aside and it goes "bi-ong!".
What... what garbage is this?? Who thought this was a good idea? WHAT HAVE THEY DONE?

I really struggle to find goodness in this pile of regurgitated virtually-12A nonsense. Nick Stahl and Claire Danes as John Connor and future wife Kate Brewster are interesting enough; they both get opportunities to appose the Terminator's mission and it doesn't feel contrived or forced.
The Terminatrix assassinating kids (who will grow up to be Connor's lieutenants) was interesting and obviously wanted to tap the 1984's original horror vibe, but it is shot poorly and the preceding breast inflation scene somehow kills the tone!

Apparently "fans" wanted Arnold to reprise the role of the Terminator, and this is what they get: a tacky parody of a film that defined and celebrated cinema action films. Good job.

Terminator 3 is a missed opportunity, I believe that had Cameron directed a final chapter it could have been engaging. If they had made the Terminator the villain again and didn't pander to the wallets of studio executives and the rabid Schwarzenegger fans, it could have been even more intriguing.

But no, we get Kristanna Loken playing a character I thought up when I was ten.




Additional Marshmallows: So colour me curious but... this film reveals to us that all Terminator T-800s have extremely volatile fuel cells in their chests, that explode when ruptured like a small nuclear blast.
Did... did these writers even watch the first film!? Because I remember things differently!

Additional additional Marshmallows: This film was so despised that they made a television series The Sarah Connor Chronicles starring Lena Headey that completely erases this film from the timeline. While the show did not receive much praise, I like to commend it just for this fact.




Terminator Salvation (2009)

You won't find a greater sympathiser of Terminator Salvation than me; that despite poor casting, poor director and poor script, I still commend it for even trying.

Judgment Day has passed and John Connor is finding his place amongst the post-apocalyptic chaos, with humanity scattered and scared and military commanders doubting their belief that Connor can save them all. Connor's own agenda to find his to-be-father Kyle Reese conflicts with his superiors' plans, but a mysterious individual going by the name of Marcus Wright could provide him his hope.

Terminator Salvation is an unlucky beast and continues a legacy of ill-advised director choices with McG, a man with only the two Charlie's Angels films to his name before and This Means War and 3 Days to Kill after his go at the Terminator franchise. Yet the studio had planned this as a new trilogy, a trilogy that would close the circling narrative of the series, to end at the beginning. Sadly, those high hopes died with an incompetent director, a furious lead actor and a lukewarm critical reception.

Personally any attempt to progress the series to new concepts, no matter how flawed, is to be commended and appreciated. 
We have no Arnold Schwarzenegger, we have no time travel, and no chase theme with destruction of contemporary surroundings. This film is set in heady 2018, before humanity was following Connor's tactics and were being wiped out by an ever increasing and evolving machine army, even the classic T-800 Terminator hadn't been created yet. The world is a blasted wasteland, the film is a wash of greys and browns and does not visually hark back to the originals at all. In fact at times Salvation is an ugly film to look at, spattered in grease and clouded in smoke.

But at least it has the freaking Terminator theme unlike Terminator 3! And at least there's plenty of practical effects on the Terminators (again, unlike Terminator 3!) which is great with the film being credited In Memory of Stan Winston, creator of the Terminator skeleton and many other film effects.
We get to see the first Terminators, described by Kyle Reese in the original film as being covered in rubber skin and were easy to spot, we get to see numerous other machines employed by Skynet, from scout drones to prison barges.
Perhaps the most interesting element is Marcus Wright (Sam Worthington), and he steals the show from Christian Bale's John Connor perplexingly enough. His character shows a piece of Skynet's more insidious side; how much of the series main antagonist is rooted in humanity's own achievements and mistakes. Sadly this plot is somewhat subdued and underplayed. Anton Yelchin plays the young Kyle Reese and also does a surprisingly good impression of Michael Biehn and could be the only thing tethering this film to the overall series.

Anyone can punch holes through Salvation as easily as a Terminator punches through a ribcage. Christian Bale infamously had a massive on set row with the film's director of photography, which was mutually resolved later, but I cannot say I think much of Bale as Connor here; he is stiff and constantly angry. He says all his lines with a gruffness that gets tiring quickly, and while adult Connor was never previously depicted in the series, I struggle to imagine this being the eventual result.
The rest of the cast is forgettable (some with silly names: Common; Moon Bloodgood) such as Bryce Dallas Howard as Kate and Michael Ironside as Michael Ironside Character No.5.

There are also massive plot inconsistencies that do more harm than good to an already questionable film series. Number one offender being Skynet's plan: kidnap Kyle Reese to lure and kill John Connor. Does Skynet not know that once you capture Kyle, killing him will erase John from existence? Thus removing John from the equation without even involving him? 
Terminator's ridiculously broken narrative means that Terminator Salvation is both a sequel and a prequel (which is unique) but this film depicts a sort of 80s Saturday morning cartoon Skynet, a Skynet that waxes lyrical instead of murdering everyone and winning.

Terminator Salvation feels like a half-hearted attempt at something that should have been fascinating and deeply threatening and bleak. The 12A and PG-13 certificate did not help this at all. To make a trilogy out of the Future War would have been an excellent change of pace and breath of fresh air in a stagnant series, but it looks like salvation will not come so easily.





Friday, 20 July 2012

Review: The Dark Knight Rises

Prometheus was supposedly "the most anticipated film of the year", but The Dark Knight Rises has certainly become the most hyped.

Eight years after the events of 2008's The Dark Knight, we find Gotham City in a peaceful state after the sacrifices that had been made. Bruce Wayne has however become a total recluse, and Batman is no more. But the peace is fragile, and a brutal mercenary known only as Bane is arriving in Gotham to fulfil a devastating agenda.



To follow The Dark Knight is a task few could ever stomach, and now I have to admit, perhaps impossible?
I will say straight off the bat, Rises is an excellent film, and continues to prove that director Christopher Nolan can bring intelligence to a massive blockbuster epic. It is still wonderfully photographed, the cast look right at home and newcomers are superb in their roles; Tom Hardy as Bane is awesome, while Anne Hathaway brings some sparks and light humour as Catwoman.



For me, it is all about the characters and how they mature, and most key in Rises is the relationship between Bruce Wayne and his loyal butler Alfred. Their scenes are dynamos of emotion as Wayne finds himself lost and without purpose, and Alfred struggles with an ever bleaker future. The sort of hard questions that should be addressed in such a scenario.
There is also a great subtext designed to hit our nerves within this financial crisis we are facing today, it isn't forced, but it is very much there.



Now my main problem with the film is an ever fading sense of theatricality... While Nolan's trilogy was always meant to be "realistic" there was always a shadowy Gothic feel remaining in Batman Begins, and the Joker's mere presence in The Dark Knight was mesmerising, while they both had vast, shadowy shots of buildings and cityscapes, Batman swooping down at his prey from the dark. Here, Nolan's turned Batman into urban warfare, quite literally by the end. Most of the film is shot in daylight and revolve around the secondary characters coping with the disasters around them. (Perhaps the daylight is symbolic over the three films, this being the "dawn"?) I hate to say it though, but this is probably the least "Batman" feeling Batman film so far.
Another issue, after some consideration, is Catwoman. Now she is excellently portrayed, and I like the character in general, but I didn't see a lot of point for her being there. Unlike the other films where characters are used to their full potential.


The plot harks back to Begins and TDK nicely though, making it feel like an ending, but it has none of the second film's chilling dread, and if it weren't for Alfred and Wayne's scenes, I may not have felt as emotionally connected to any of the characters either.
It sounds like I didn't like it... which isn't true, but it felt long, and that isn't good. I had my issues with TDK initially and they have faded completely, so perhaps Rises will do the same in time?



Saga Review: Batman

Possibly one of the most iconic, well received and respected "superheroes" created, Batman's success is thanks to the relatively down-to-Earth nature of the character, a billionaire with a taste for vengeance, with training and a lot of gadgets.
It is the villains that broaden Batman's scope, and are always the most interesting and mesmerising elements in any story.


I speak as a fan of film, not comics; I've never read a Batman comic, but a lot of friends tell me all about the stories and major developments. As a fan of films, Batman has been with me since the beginning, and I only realise this now with this Saga Review; I was five when Tim Burton's Batman hit the scene, and I was watching it and Batman Returns at home before I finally got to see Batman Forever in the cinema.
Now Christopher Nolan has stated that The Dark Knight Rises is the last Batman film in his trilogy, and marks the end of an era. I cannot say I am disappointed by this, in fact I respect him for it; the last thing we want is another Batman and Robin to come coughing out of the Hollywood machine and sour the crop!
Oh yes, that film is in here too. From 1989 to 2008. Riddle me this, riddle me that...




Batman (1989)

The theatrical, Gothic gem that started it all.

Before Tim Burton was Tim Burton, his early interpretation of the DC comic book hero Batman would show Hollywood what is possible with the genre; it was dark, adult orientated and thick with atmosphere. It was before comics were “cool” and mainstream, Batman isn’t even accurate to the origin story and if it were made for today’s audience, it would have been slandered. But this was all we had, and looking back at it you can still forgive its flaws because of its theatrical, quirky darkness. That, and a truly awesome score by Danny Elfman.
(Whatever happened to Elfman and Burton?)
Jack Nicholson gets top billing as Jack Napier, a gangster who’s dream of taking control of Gotham’s crime syndicate becomes reality when he is viciously transformed into the maniacal Joker. Blaming the spectre-like Batman vigilante, he seeks revenge, while at the same time Bruce Wayne discovers his own vengeance isn’t far away.
You can already tell how I love this film’s mood and tone; Burton’s heavy use of shadows and keeping Batman almost entirely obscured (visually and in terms of the story). The city and costume design make it more timeless than retro, while it boasts the undisputed best Batmobile put to film.
Its strengths can be its weaknesses too however. The plot and character development are relatively shallow, taking a back seat for the theatre and straight up loopiness of Nicholson’s Joker, while I have to say – asides from Michael Gough who will always be Wayne’s faithful butler Alfred in my eyes – the supporting cast is far from spectacular. Kim Basinger goes from subplots to screaming damsel, while the irritating comic-relief Alexander Knox is mercifully forgettable.
This is Nicholson and Keaton’s movie, without any doubt.
As a film I grew up with as a kid, I will always respect it, and must say to anyone growing up with Nolan’s trilogy to check it out! It may be goofy at times, but it has subtle strengths that do outmatch the new trilogy.




Batman Returns (1992)

Tim Burton’s second outing is even bleaker and even more unsettling, yet I love it, I know it all beat for beat.

Batman is called into action once more when the monstrous Penguin rises from the sewers to take over Gotham with the aid of a double-dealing businessman Max Shreck. Meanwhile Shreck inadvertently creates the psychotic Catwoman after attempting to kill his snooping secretary.

There’s quite a bit more going on in Batman Returns, and it would begin a common trend of doubling up comic book villains in the series. This makes for an action packed sequel with several characters to develop. Christopher Walken’s Shreck may seem like the odd one out, but given how the story ties him so closely with our two antagonists, you cannot imagine the film without him. It is an origin story for Catwoman and Penguin, to the point where Batman himself takes a back seat; reading into their own inner demons and terrible psychosis (I always find myself oddly sorry for the Penguin...)

The casting remains solid since the first film; Michelle Pfeiffer and Danny DeVito are great, and for me they embody the characters they portray. Keaton perhaps proves even more how he can pull off both Batman and Bruce Wayne extremely well.
 It is very bleak (spearheading perhaps Burton’s obsession with such tales) Catwoman’s story especially, but it keeps some of the completely nutty aspects of the first film; Penguin’s army of penguins armed with rocket launchers, anyone, or Catwoman’s duel nature being very much catlike rather than a cat burglar (her transition is easily the most bizarre and spontaneous).

It got a lot of criticism for its nightmarish visuals, especially from parents, and would see Burton give up the directing role for future films. I personally love it. It has crisp, clean visuals, the Danny Elfman score is still epic, the casting is superb (supporting cast much improved) and you have to love its pop song accompaniment Face to Face by Siouxsie and the Banshees.




Batman Forever (1995)

From the backlash against Batman Returns, Val Kilmer takes on the role and Joel Schumacher directs this intensely marketable and family friendly instalment. Do I have mixed feelings or what!

During an ongoing battle between Batman and the ex-District Attorney Harvey Dent, aka Two-Face, jealous Wayne Enterprises employee Edward Nygma becomes the power-crazed Riddler.
In 1995 I was completely hooked on Batman Returns, and while I knew this was different it was the first Batman film I saw in cinemas and it easily sparked my interest in the Two-Face character and Tommy Lee Jones forever after.
It is a real shame then that watching it again now... proves how unbearable (and inaccurate) that character is to watch, at least most of the time.

The film is an interesting hybrid of what came before and what will... arrive later. It takes some unique perspectives on Batman’s personality, and the conflict between him and Robin is intriguing (if poorly written) in some ways it goes further with the Batman character than the second film.
However all of Burton’s atmospheric grace is gone. The soundtrack is a weird mash of blaring trumpets and pulpy “spooky” tunes straight from retro horror movies; these and several pop songs for good measure. The lighting is out of this world, making Gotham less Gothic and more TV-show, while there is so much neon. SO MUCH NEON!

I can’t say I hate it; this is about as cartoonish as Batman could ever get away with. The script is to blame here, Jim Carrey is great as the Riddler but sometimes it goes a little too far, while Two-Face’s character is criminally wasted here. Easily one of the most complex villains is reduced to a cackling madman, and Tommy Lee Jones could have easily pulled the character off nicely.
It is good fun, there are plenty of problems (both little and large) but in hindsight, it could be a lot worse....


Oh god, don’t make me do this...



Batman and Robin (1997)

How can something already bad get even worse with time? I feel genuinely stupider having watched this again... I guess the joke’s on me.

So, Batman and Robin are a malfunctioning team as the maniac Mister Freeze runs rampage over Gotham City, while a deadly femme fatale Poison Ivy (and her “muscle”, Bane) seek world domination.
 Okay, so let’s get the good stuff out of the way first, since that will take less time.
There is no good stuff.
Batman and Robin is a vacuous void of positively loathsome filmmaking, so bad you could imagine Uwe Boll himself swooning at its disastrous proportions. You have to be drunk, or with a load of friends, to dare watch this... this piece of footage, to watch alone is to deduct years from your life.

I don’t know where to start; this is probably like repairing a city after a holocaust. Arnold Schwarzenegger, why is he in this? No Batman movie could ever survive having him cast in it, not to mention they treat the surprisingly deep Mr Freeze character with the same dignity they gave Two Face; the character is dead on arrival (unless you have a warped sense of humour). Uma Thurman is actually a good cast for the voluptuous Poison Ivy, but again the script makes her a train wreck of puns too.
It is boldly and foolishly harking back to the Adam West TV show, so much so we get “whhheee!” sound effects as people fly through the air, stupid, stupid fight sequences and utterly campy scenarios that defy all conventional belief. So many I cannot begin to list them.
Despite the mountain of repetitive garbage this thing produces (from Arnold spouting one-liners to Robin whining all the time, the plot is drivel) we have poor butler Alfred actually attempting to have a meaningful subplot and character development, a plot that is gut-wrenchingly wasted here.
I... I don’t even know. I watch a lot of films, a lot, I marathon films, yet this has to be the longest two hours put to celluloid; I kid you not I was falling asleep, despite the film’s zany bright colours and disgustingly camp nonsense it kept hurling at me.

I wanted to try and like something from this... but it is so, so difficult. Alfred’s storyline is unique and the villains are good villains in theory (heck, they are almost faithful to the materials) but the script and story are just such travesties! I just don’t see why Batman Forever’s tone needed to be made even dumber for this movie? Forever was a huge financial success, why go the extra mile to make something so horrible??




Batman Begins (2005)

Oh thank goodness. Batman fans across the globe owe a lot to intellectual director Christopher Nolan for giving the cape crusader a new, intense look.

Going back to before Batman, a lost and enraged Bruce Wayne seeks the ability to fight injustice after the tragic deaths of his parents. His training comes from The League of Shadows and their leader, Ra’s Al Ghul, but seeing their code as immoral, Wayne looks for his own symbol to defend Gotham City.
We see Gotham in a state of depression; once glorious but now tarnished during Wayne’s absence, and now rife with criminals. The gangster Falcone and insidious Dr. Crane are working for a mysterious third party in a bid to ruin Gotham completely, only to find a shadowy vigilante pursuing them.

There is a lot going on in this film for just over two hours. The film goes into Bruce Wayne’s psyche much further than any of the previous instalment, showing us his vulnerabilities but also how these directly empower Batman. The film’s motif is fear, and one’s bravery to control that fear.

The casting is unbelievably top-notch (the cast and crew predominantly British I might add!) and love him or hate him, Christian Bale does an excellent job as a Batman who’s violent drive is almost uncontrollable, while also being an excellent Bruce Wayne. Though I must admit, Katie Holmes doesn’t have great presence here, and I have to adjust for Michael Cane as Alfred (he is amazing, but I still see Michael Gough as Alfred... forever).
The visuals and lighting aren’t as arresting as Tim Burton’s Batman, but they are certainly striking and shadowy, while Hans Zimmer’s music is triumphant (especially in the incredible third act) it doesn’t stick with you like Danny Elfman’s haunting melody.


It is a massive “Batman’s is back!” and a faithful interpretation of the lore, loaded with references but watchable by all. It has a great vein of humour too, but it is subtle, lighting the intensity. Oh, and I remember my distrust of the Tumbler when I first saw photos... but no, that car chase has to be one of the best chase sequences in all of the Batman films so far!




The Dark Knight (2008)

Like a fine wine, director Christopher Nolan’s masterpiece only improves with time and viewings!

Following the events of Batman Begins, the story sees Gotham City in a state of change; Batman’s presence has the criminal underworld running scared, and hope begins to emerge as a charismatic and passionate new District Attorney, Harvey Dent, emerges. However a psychotic madman, known only as The Joker, wants nothing more than to spread anarchy, and prove everyone is corruptible.
The film is epic in proportions; a lengthy two hours and twenty minutes which is jam-packed with story and most importantly character development. While Heath Ledger’s Joker character is phenomenally terrifying (and sadistically amusing) he is merely a means to an end, and the more I watch this film the more I am drawn to one of my favourite Batman characters, Harvey Dent, and his tragic story. I’m a sucker for tragic heroes, and The Dark Knight sells it perfectly (says one viewer who initially felt short-changed by the film in this respect).
Bruce Wayne’s internal struggle has never been harder than here. With Gotham on the brink of salvation only to have it disintegrate around him, Batman’s strengths are proven virtually useless as lives of those he cares about are put at risk.
While the film may distance some viewers (it is longer and deeply unsettling at times) the story’s pacing and escalation is immersive, while the tone and mood is delicately merciless. Hans Zimmer’s score here is far better than in Begins, going from tranquil to nails-on-chalkboard chilling, intensifying Joker’s influence on a terrified Gotham City.

One thing I do miss is the rustic orange look of Begins, while that film was set in “The Narrows” and TDK was set in central Gotham, it does look like Chicago now rather than a Gothic city (where exactly did all the monorails go?) but Chicago or not, it is beautifully shot.
It is a marvel of action/drama cinema, and I implore you to re-watch it if you weren’t impressed initially (which is unlikely!) the use of music, camera work and lighting only adds to the fracturing mood, while the casting and acting is perfect across the board.




The Dark Knight is an extremely tough performance to surpass, and as I write this epilogue to possibly the most enjoyable film marathon I've done yet, I have seen the final chapter.

Does it add up? Does it give one of my favourite movie-going heroes a decent send off? You'll have to bear with me a little longer to find out.
*wink*