It is the villains that broaden Batman's scope, and are always the most interesting and mesmerising elements in any story.
I speak as a fan of film, not comics; I've never read a Batman comic, but a lot of friends tell me all about the stories and major developments. As a fan of films, Batman has been with me since the beginning, and I only realise this now with this Saga Review; I was five when Tim Burton's Batman hit the scene, and I was watching it and Batman Returns at home before I finally got to see Batman Forever in the cinema.
Now Christopher Nolan has stated that The Dark Knight Rises is the last Batman film in his trilogy, and marks the end of an era. I cannot say I am disappointed by this, in fact I respect him for it; the last thing we want is another Batman and Robin to come coughing out of the Hollywood machine and sour the crop!
Oh yes, that film is in here too. From 1989 to 2008. Riddle me this, riddle me that...
Batman (1989)
The theatrical, Gothic gem that started it all.
Before Tim Burton was Tim
Burton, his early interpretation of the DC comic book hero Batman would
show Hollywood what is possible with the genre; it was dark, adult orientated
and thick with atmosphere. It was before comics were “cool” and mainstream, Batman isn’t even accurate to the origin
story and if it were made for today’s audience, it would have been slandered.
But this was all we had, and looking back at it you can still forgive its flaws
because of its theatrical, quirky darkness. That, and a truly awesome score by
Danny Elfman.
(Whatever happened to Elfman and Burton?)
Jack Nicholson gets top billing as Jack Napier, a gangster
who’s dream of taking control of Gotham’s crime syndicate becomes reality when
he is viciously transformed into the maniacal Joker. Blaming the spectre-like
Batman vigilante, he seeks revenge, while at the same time Bruce Wayne
discovers his own vengeance isn’t far away.
You can already tell how I love this film’s mood and tone;
Burton’s heavy use of shadows and keeping Batman almost entirely obscured
(visually and in terms of the story). The city and costume design make it more
timeless than retro, while it boasts the undisputed best Batmobile put to film.
Its strengths can be its weaknesses too however. The plot
and character development are relatively shallow, taking a back seat for the
theatre and straight up loopiness of Nicholson’s Joker, while I have to say –
asides from Michael Gough who will always be Wayne’s faithful butler Alfred in
my eyes – the supporting cast is far from spectacular. Kim Basinger goes from
subplots to screaming damsel, while the irritating comic-relief Alexander Knox
is mercifully forgettable.
This is Nicholson and Keaton’s movie, without any doubt.
This is Nicholson and Keaton’s movie, without any doubt.
As a film I grew up with as a kid, I will always respect it,
and must say to anyone growing up with Nolan’s trilogy to check it out! It may
be goofy at times, but it has subtle strengths that do outmatch the new
trilogy.
Batman Returns (1992)
Tim Burton’s second outing is even bleaker and even more
unsettling, yet I love it, I know it all beat for beat.
Batman is called into action once more when the monstrous
Penguin rises from the sewers to take over Gotham with the aid of a
double-dealing businessman Max Shreck. Meanwhile Shreck inadvertently creates
the psychotic Catwoman after attempting to kill his snooping secretary.
There’s quite a bit more going on in Batman Returns, and it would begin a common trend of doubling up
comic book villains in the series. This makes for an action packed sequel with
several characters to develop. Christopher Walken’s Shreck may seem like the
odd one out, but given how the story ties him so closely with our two
antagonists, you cannot imagine the film without him. It is an origin story for
Catwoman and Penguin, to the point where Batman himself takes a back seat;
reading into their own inner demons and terrible psychosis (I always find
myself oddly sorry for the Penguin...)
The casting remains solid since the first film; Michelle Pfeiffer and Danny DeVito are great, and for me they embody the characters they portray. Keaton perhaps proves even more how he can pull off both Batman and Bruce Wayne extremely well.
It is very bleak (spearheading perhaps Burton’s obsession with such tales) Catwoman’s story especially, but it keeps some of the completely nutty aspects of the first film; Penguin’s army of penguins armed with rocket launchers, anyone, or Catwoman’s duel nature being very much catlike rather than a cat burglar (her transition is easily the most bizarre and spontaneous).
It got a lot of criticism for its nightmarish visuals, especially from parents, and would see Burton give up the directing role for future films. I personally love it. It has crisp, clean visuals, the Danny Elfman score is still epic, the casting is superb (supporting cast much improved) and you have to love its pop song accompaniment Face to Face by Siouxsie and the Banshees.
Batman Forever (1995)
From the backlash against Batman Returns, Val Kilmer takes on the
role and Joel Schumacher directs this intensely marketable and family friendly
instalment. Do I have mixed feelings or what!
During an ongoing battle between Batman and the ex-District
Attorney Harvey Dent, aka Two-Face, jealous Wayne Enterprises employee Edward
Nygma becomes the power-crazed Riddler.
In 1995 I was completely hooked on Batman Returns, and while
I knew this was different it was the first Batman film I saw in cinemas and it
easily sparked my interest in the Two-Face character and Tommy Lee Jones
forever after.
It is a real shame then that watching it again now... proves how unbearable (and inaccurate) that character is to watch, at least most of the time.
The film is an interesting hybrid of what came before and what will... arrive later. It takes some unique perspectives on Batman’s personality, and the conflict between him and Robin is intriguing (if poorly written) in some ways it goes further with the Batman character than the second film.
It is a real shame then that watching it again now... proves how unbearable (and inaccurate) that character is to watch, at least most of the time.
The film is an interesting hybrid of what came before and what will... arrive later. It takes some unique perspectives on Batman’s personality, and the conflict between him and Robin is intriguing (if poorly written) in some ways it goes further with the Batman character than the second film.
However all of Burton’s atmospheric grace is gone. The
soundtrack is a weird mash of blaring trumpets and pulpy “spooky” tunes
straight from retro horror movies; these and several pop songs for good
measure. The lighting is out of this world, making Gotham less Gothic and more
TV-show, while there is so much neon. SO MUCH NEON!
I can’t say I hate it; this is about as cartoonish as Batman
could ever get away with. The script is to blame here, Jim Carrey is great as
the Riddler but sometimes it goes a little too far, while Two-Face’s character
is criminally wasted here. Easily one of the most complex villains is reduced to
a cackling madman, and Tommy Lee Jones could have easily pulled the character
off nicely.
It is good fun, there are plenty of problems (both little
and large) but in hindsight, it could be a lot worse....
Oh god, don’t make me do this...
Batman and Robin (1997)
How can something already bad get even worse with time? I feel genuinely stupider having watched this
again... I guess the joke’s on me.
So, Batman and Robin are a malfunctioning team as the maniac Mister Freeze runs rampage over Gotham City, while a deadly femme fatale Poison Ivy (and her “muscle”, Bane) seek world domination.
Okay, so let’s get the good stuff out of the way first, since that will take less time.
So, Batman and Robin are a malfunctioning team as the maniac Mister Freeze runs rampage over Gotham City, while a deadly femme fatale Poison Ivy (and her “muscle”, Bane) seek world domination.
Okay, so let’s get the good stuff out of the way first, since that will take less time.
There is no good stuff.
Batman and Robin is a vacuous void of positively loathsome
filmmaking, so bad you could imagine Uwe Boll himself swooning at its
disastrous proportions. You have to be drunk, or with a load of friends, to
dare watch this... this piece of footage, to watch alone is to deduct years
from your life.
I don’t know where to start; this is probably like repairing a city after a holocaust. Arnold Schwarzenegger, why is he in this? No Batman movie could ever survive having him cast in it, not to mention they treat the surprisingly deep Mr Freeze character with the same dignity they gave Two Face; the character is dead on arrival (unless you have a warped sense of humour). Uma Thurman is actually a good cast for the voluptuous Poison Ivy, but again the script makes her a train wreck of puns too.
I don’t know where to start; this is probably like repairing a city after a holocaust. Arnold Schwarzenegger, why is he in this? No Batman movie could ever survive having him cast in it, not to mention they treat the surprisingly deep Mr Freeze character with the same dignity they gave Two Face; the character is dead on arrival (unless you have a warped sense of humour). Uma Thurman is actually a good cast for the voluptuous Poison Ivy, but again the script makes her a train wreck of puns too.
It is boldly and foolishly harking back to the Adam West TV
show, so much so we get “whhheee!” sound effects as people fly through the air,
stupid, stupid fight sequences and utterly campy scenarios that defy all
conventional belief. So many I cannot begin to list them.
Despite the mountain of repetitive garbage this thing produces (from Arnold spouting one-liners to Robin whining all the time, the plot is drivel) we have poor butler Alfred actually attempting to have a meaningful subplot and character development, a plot that is gut-wrenchingly wasted here.
I... I don’t even know. I watch a lot of films,
a lot, I marathon films, yet this has to be the longest two hours put to
celluloid; I kid you not I was falling asleep, despite the film’s zany bright
colours and disgustingly camp nonsense it kept hurling at me. Despite the mountain of repetitive garbage this thing produces (from Arnold spouting one-liners to Robin whining all the time, the plot is drivel) we have poor butler Alfred actually attempting to have a meaningful subplot and character development, a plot that is gut-wrenchingly wasted here.
I wanted to try and like something from this... but it is so, so difficult. Alfred’s storyline is unique and the villains are good villains in theory (heck, they are almost faithful to the materials) but the script and story are just such travesties! I just don’t see why Batman Forever’s tone needed to be made even dumber for this movie? Forever was a huge financial success, why go the extra mile to make something so horrible??
Batman Begins (2005)
Oh thank goodness. Batman fans across the globe owe a lot to
intellectual director Christopher Nolan for giving the cape crusader a new,
intense look.
Going back to before Batman, a lost and enraged Bruce Wayne
seeks the ability to fight injustice after the tragic deaths of his parents.
His training comes from The League of Shadows and their leader, Ra’s Al Ghul,
but seeing their code as immoral, Wayne looks for his own symbol to defend
Gotham City.
We see Gotham in a state of depression; once glorious but
now tarnished during Wayne’s absence, and now rife with criminals. The gangster
Falcone and insidious Dr. Crane are working for a mysterious third party in a
bid to ruin Gotham completely, only to find a shadowy vigilante pursuing them.
There is a lot going on in this film for just over two hours. The film goes into Bruce Wayne’s psyche much further than any of the previous instalment, showing us his vulnerabilities but also how these directly empower Batman. The film’s motif is fear, and one’s bravery to control that fear.
The casting is unbelievably top-notch (the cast and crew predominantly British I might add!) and love him or hate him, Christian Bale does an excellent job as a Batman who’s violent drive is almost uncontrollable, while also being an excellent Bruce Wayne. Though I must admit, Katie Holmes doesn’t have great presence here, and I have to adjust for Michael Cane as Alfred (he is amazing, but I still see Michael Gough as Alfred... forever).
The visuals and lighting aren’t as arresting as Tim Burton’s Batman, but they are certainly striking and shadowy, while Hans Zimmer’s music is triumphant (especially in the incredible third act) it doesn’t stick with you like Danny Elfman’s haunting melody.
It is a massive “Batman’s is back!” and a
faithful interpretation of the lore, loaded with references but watchable by
all. It has a great vein of humour too, but it is subtle, lighting the
intensity. Oh, and I remember my distrust of the Tumbler when I first saw
photos... but no, that car chase has to be one of the best chase sequences in
all of the Batman films so far!There is a lot going on in this film for just over two hours. The film goes into Bruce Wayne’s psyche much further than any of the previous instalment, showing us his vulnerabilities but also how these directly empower Batman. The film’s motif is fear, and one’s bravery to control that fear.
The casting is unbelievably top-notch (the cast and crew predominantly British I might add!) and love him or hate him, Christian Bale does an excellent job as a Batman who’s violent drive is almost uncontrollable, while also being an excellent Bruce Wayne. Though I must admit, Katie Holmes doesn’t have great presence here, and I have to adjust for Michael Cane as Alfred (he is amazing, but I still see Michael Gough as Alfred... forever).
The visuals and lighting aren’t as arresting as Tim Burton’s Batman, but they are certainly striking and shadowy, while Hans Zimmer’s music is triumphant (especially in the incredible third act) it doesn’t stick with you like Danny Elfman’s haunting melody.
The Dark Knight (2008)
Like a fine wine, director Christopher Nolan’s masterpiece
only improves with time and viewings!
Following the events of Batman
Begins, the story sees Gotham City in a state of change; Batman’s presence
has the criminal underworld running scared, and hope begins to emerge as a
charismatic and passionate new District Attorney, Harvey Dent, emerges. However
a psychotic madman, known only as The Joker, wants nothing more than to spread
anarchy, and prove everyone is corruptible.
The film is epic in proportions; a lengthy two hours and
twenty minutes which is jam-packed with story and most importantly character development. While Heath
Ledger’s Joker character is phenomenally terrifying (and sadistically amusing) he
is merely a means to an end, and the more I watch this film the more I am drawn
to one of my favourite Batman characters, Harvey Dent, and his tragic story.
I’m a sucker for tragic heroes, and The
Dark Knight sells it perfectly (says one viewer who initially felt
short-changed by the film in this respect).
Bruce Wayne’s internal struggle has never been harder than
here. With Gotham on the brink of salvation only to have it disintegrate around
him, Batman’s strengths are proven virtually useless as lives of those he cares
about are put at risk.
While the film may distance some viewers (it is longer and
deeply unsettling at times) the story’s pacing and escalation is immersive,
while the tone and mood is delicately merciless. Hans Zimmer’s score here is
far better than in Begins, going from
tranquil to nails-on-chalkboard chilling, intensifying Joker’s influence on a
terrified Gotham City.
One thing I do miss is the rustic orange look of Begins, while that film was set in “The Narrows” and TDK was set in central Gotham, it does look like Chicago now rather than a Gothic city (where exactly did all the monorails go?) but Chicago or not, it is beautifully shot.
One thing I do miss is the rustic orange look of Begins, while that film was set in “The Narrows” and TDK was set in central Gotham, it does look like Chicago now rather than a Gothic city (where exactly did all the monorails go?) but Chicago or not, it is beautifully shot.
It is a marvel of action/drama cinema, and I implore you to
re-watch it if you weren’t impressed initially (which is unlikely!) the use of
music, camera work and lighting only adds to the fracturing mood, while the
casting and acting is perfect across the board.
The Dark Knight is an extremely tough performance to surpass, and as I write this epilogue to possibly the most enjoyable film marathon I've done yet, I have seen the final chapter.
Does it add up? Does it give one of my favourite movie-going heroes a decent send off? You'll have to bear with me a little longer to find out.
*wink*
Great reviews, I agree with most of what you said! Batman Returns will always be my favourite, mainly due to the nostalgia factor - I saw it 5 times in the cinema!! Plus, Danny Elfman IS Batman's music for me.
ReplyDeleteI didn't take to Batman Begins very well, but I think I've only seen it twice many years ago, and I've only seen the Dark Knight once - will need to rectify that, as I thought it was amazing.
Your Batman & Robin made me chuckle... it's so true. What an awful, awful film!
Very much so with Danny Elfman's music! Hans Zimmer does a great job in Begins and especially TDK, but it just isn't the same.
DeleteBatman Begins I really like the aesthetics and colour palette, all the oranges and blacks of The Narrows and Arkham Asylum were very unique. Plus the Tumbler... being awesome.
I cannot stress enough how BORED I was watching Batman and Robin, compared to all the other films it is the most action packed and noisy, yet I couldn't focus on it! It is strange because there is an idea buried deeeeep down where that film works, but there's an endless pile of rubbish stacked on it! Ghastly.